Updated: September 15 '06, June 24 '14
Previous: Solar System Data Up: The Solar System Next: The Sun
Particle Physics and Astronomy Research Council
Royal Greenwich Observatory
_________________________________________________________
Information Leaflet No. 62: 'The Origin of the Solar System'
The Origin of the Solar System:
The earliest accounts of how the Sun, the Earth and the rest of the Solar System were formed are to be found in early myths, legends and religious texts. None of these can be considered a serious scientific account.
The earliest scientific attempts to explain the origin of the Solar System invoked collisions or condensations from a gas cloud. The discovery of 'island universes', which we now know to be galaxies, was thought to confirm this latter theory.
During this century Jeans proposed the idea that material had been dragged out of the Sun by a passing star and that this material had then condensed to form the planets. There are serious flaws to this explanation but recent developments have been made suggesting that a filament was drawn out of a passing protostar at a time when the Sun was a member of a loose cluster of stars, but the most favoured theories still involve the gravitational collapse of a gas and dust cloud.
The problems to be faced by any theory for the formation of the Solar
System:
Any theory has to account for certain rather tricky facts about the Solar
System.
These are in addition to the obvious facts that the Sun is at the
centre with the planets in orbit around it.
There are 5 of these problem areas:
Bode's 'law' takes the form of a series in which the first term is 0, the second is 3, and each term is then double the previous one, to each term add 4 and divide the result by 10. This yields the series of numbers:
0.4, 0.7, 1.0, 1.6, 2.8, 5.2, 10.0, 19.6, 38.8
which may be compared to the mean distances of the planets from the Sun in AU:
0.39, 0.72, 1.0, 1.52, 5.2, 9.52, 19.26, 30.1, 39.8
The agreement for all but Neptune and Pluto is remarkable.
The lack of a planet at 2.8 led to the discovery of the asteroids.
There are 5 theories which are still considered to be 'reasonable' in that they explain many (but not all) of the phenomena exhibited by the Solar System.
The Accretion theory:
This assumes that the Sun passed through a dense interstellar cloud, and emerged surrounded by a dusty, gaseous envelope. It thus separates the formation of the Sun from that of the planets, thus losing problem 1.
The problem which remains is that of getting the cloud to form the planets.
The terrestrial planets can form in a reasonable time, but the gaseous
planets take far too long to form.
The theory does not explain satellites or Bode's law, and must be considered
the weakest of those described here.
The Protoplanet theory:
This assumes, that initially there is a dense interstellar cloud, which will
eventually produce a cluster of stars.
Dense regions in the cloud form and coalesce; as the small blobs have random
spins, the resulting stars will have low rotation rates.
The planets are smaller blobs captured by the star. The small blobs would
have a higher rotation than is seen in the planets, but the theory accounts
for this by having the 'planetary blobs' split, to give a planet and its
satellites.
Thus, many of the problem areas are covered, but it is not clear how the planets came to be confined to a plane, or why their rotations are in the same sense.
The Capture theory:
This theory is a version of Jeans's theory, in which the Sun interacts with
a nearby protostar, dragging a filament of material from the protostar.
The low rotation speed of the Sun, is explained as being due to its formation
before the planets.
The terrestrial planets are explained by collisions between the protoplanets
close to the Sun.
And the giant planets and their satellites, are explained as condensations
in the drawn out filament.
The Modern Laplacian theory:
Laplace in 1796 first suggested that the Sun and the planets formed in a rotating nebula which cooled and collapsed. It condensed into rings which eventually formed the planets, and a central mass which became the Sun. The slow spin of the Sun could not be explained.
The modern version assumes that the central condensation contains solid dust grains which create drag in the gas as the centre condenses. Eventually, after the core has been slowed its temperature rises and the dust is evaporated. The slowly rotating core becomes the Sun. The planets form from the faster rotating cloud.
The Modern Nebula theory:
Observations of very young stars indicate that they are surrounded by dense
dusty disks.
While there are still difficulties in explaining some of the problem areas
outlined above, in particular ways to slow down the rotation of the Sun, it
is believed that the planets originated in a dense disk, which formed from
material in the gas and dust cloud, which collapsed to give the Sun.
The density of this disk has to be sufficient to allow the formation of the
planets, and yet be thin enough for the residual matter to be blown away by
the Sun as its energy output increased.
Conclusion:
There have been many attempts to develop theories for the origin of the Solar System. None of them can be described as totally satisfactory and it is possible that there will further developments which may better explain the known facts.
We do believe, however, that we understand the overall mechanism, which is that the Sun and the planets formed from the contraction of part of a gas/dust cloud under its own gravitational pull, and that the small net rotation of the cloud was responsible for the formation of a disk around the central condensation.
The central condensation eventually formed the Sun, while small condensations in the disk formed the planets and their satellites. The energy from the young Sun blew away the remaining gas and dust, leaving the Solar System as we see it today.
Produced by the Information Services Department of the Royal Greenwich Observatory.
PJA Thu Apr 18 10:43:06 GMT 1996
webman@mail.ast.cam.ac.uk
Note:
Pluto is now a "dwarf planet" by
The IAU definition of "planet" and "dwarf planets"
(August 24 '06).
See Observatorio ARVAL: Solar System Data.
On 13 September '06 the IAU Minor Planet Center assigned to Pluto the asteroid number 134340.
See IAU Minor Planet Center Circular 8747 (.pdf).
Updated: September 15 '06, June 24 '14
Best seen with Font Verdana.
See About the Web Pages of Observatorio ARVAL.
Back: ARVAL - RGO Leaflets - The Solar System
Messages: